T-Shirts and Suits Creative Enterprise Network

Creative Enterprise Network :: www.creative-enterprise-network.com

That photo of Che Guevara...


... you know the one I mean. The the famous one of Che Guevara wearing a beret. It's been reproduced millions of times, not least on t-shirts and posters. You'd think it was in the public domain but actually the copyright belonged to the original Cuban photographer, Alberto Díaz 'Korda' Gutierrez - and now to his estate following his death in 2001.


Korda took the photo in March 1960 and didn't mind it being reproduced world-wide, even though he didn't benefit financially, because the image became an icon of the Cuban revolution.


He did object, however, when it was used to sell alcohol. Che Guevara, a doctor by profession, was teetotal. Korda sued Smirnoff Vodka and prevented the use of his photograph for this commercial purpose. His daughter is now involved in similar lawsuits according to the Guardian.


The point is that copyright isn't just about money. The creator's moral rights establish their authorship independently of commercial considerations. (So the credits for the song 'Yesterday' remain with Lennon/McCartney, even though they signed away the commercial rights many years ago.)


Lou Reed refused to allow Susan Boyle to sing his song 'Perfect Day', according to this article.


Copyright also allows the creator to control the use of their creation, preventing its inappropriate use. This applies to photos, music, film, writing and all other art forms protected by copyright.


Moral rights as well as commercial rights are important for creative entrepreneurs. All the more reason to understand copyright law and use licences such as those offered by the Creative Commons to control the usage, adaptation and commercialisation of creative works.


---

This article was first posted on the T-Shirts and Suits blog.

---

Tags: Che, Commons, Creative, Cuba, Guevara, Korda, commercial, copyright, moral, rights

Views: 25

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Definately right with this, the image licencing system, coupled with obtaining property and model releases for photography, means I can protect my work from uses that I or my models wouldn't be happy with.

Also, it sets in place a professional relationship with clients; they understand what images can be used for and what they can't - and as long as they stick to the release and licence useage agreed they are free from any 'come backs' from unhappy property owners or people that feel they have been mis-represented. Giving away creative labour for free, ignoring copyright and not providing a licencing structure leaves individuals, the creator and end clients open up to all sorts of problems in the future and possible court action if the wrong people get upset.
To find out more about intellectual property, check out the following event!!

'Rights for Artists'
17 Mar (Wed), 6-8pm
Central St Martins
More details on: www.ecca-london.org/events/eventdetails/?eid=918
On a flippant note, the juxtaposition of Che Guevara on a blog about T-Shirts reminded me of this photo I took in Camden Market a few years ago:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=5409644&l=0c2b638a29&...

RSS

© 2012   Created by David Parrish.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service